On Jun 28, 2015, at 1:36 PM, Anna Von Fritz <email@example.com> wrote:
A lot of what appears to be judicial misconduct isn’t “judicial” in any sense, it is purely private business being carried out under false presumptions and pretenses.
The Commissions review “judicial” actions to make sure that the judge is benefiting the corporation’s interests and that they are giving the correct APPEARANCE of being a court and acting according to “law” while in fact functioning as privateers.
You must ALWAYS remember what you are dealing with–
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 28, 2015, at 9:22 AM, ARNIE ROSNER <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
In the service of the creator.
It takes so few words to express the truth!
Available 24/7 –
714-501-8247 – mobile
Displayed In Honor of…
View original post 208 more words